Nvidia Qudroo 4000 Plus In My
Nvidia Qudroo 4000 Mac Edition Card
Nvidia Qudroo 4000 Upgrade To Mojave

For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.

Now I know that Mojave doesnt support my pc, because my graphics card is WAY too old to support Metal.

But have a look at this image from system information on my hackintosh.

Nvidia Qudroo 4000 Upgrade To Mojave

REALLY xD Now its not that I really want to upgrade to Mojave.

I already have High Sierra running perfectly, but I like to keep all my devices updated I hope you guys can understand.

So, does my Quadro 4000 really support Metal (which means I can install Mojave) Thanks in advance.

By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

As I wrote in my first post, I use a LOT of photoshop and, for doing animations, After Effect (that would improve with quadro 4000) and Apple Motion.

The processors are 2x2.8 ghz Ive 14gb RAM and two graphic cards: ATI 5770 (1gb), connected to a Cintiq 22hd, and an ATI 3870 (512mb) connected to a cinema display 23.

I mostly use: (cs6) Photoshop, Illustrator, Flash, Premiere, After Effects, Soundbooth (Apple) Apple motion 4 (3d software) Daz Studio (Id like to use CUDA for installing OCTANE for the rendering), Cinema 4d, ZBrush.

Do you think that comparing to my actual setup, could I see good benefits (more speed) in using the apps listed above, if I would mount the quadro 4000 Thanks in advance to everyone that will post a reply.

This might be interesting for you since the quadro 4000 has cuda cores: However I would advise against it (if you have a choice).

Is that right So this should be the reason for buying a quadro instead The power consumption As a matter of facts, I see this card has a higher power consumption than the quadro.

You are right with your assessment that the EVGA 680 is more of an all-good-around card and not dedicated only to the professional market.

Only a very small amount of people need that bit of unique features from a quadro card really.

If you do heavy CAD stuff, than you shoot for the quadro, especially when you use Catia V5V6 or ProE from various companies such as Dassault.

If money is not an obstacle have a look here: The smart-underground-geek route would be this: A review from 2011 () of the Quadro 4000.

Hi, first of all thanks for the super fast reply So youre approving my possible upgrading to quadro 4000.

To compare with the Radeon 5770Hd as reference, for Photoshop, illustrator, Flash the difference will be minimal or sometimes not too noticeable.

But for After Effects, Premier Pro the Quadro 4000 will be faster.

I dont work on 3D graphics or Cinema 4D but I think the Quadro 4000 performs well with 3D work.

Nvidia Qudroo 4000 Mac Edition Card

The Nvidia 680GTX Mac Edition card mentioned is a good card and will work on your 2008 Mac Pro.

When I work on large posters or streamers or multi layered Photoshop files, the Radeon 5770 sometimes struggles when I edit or navigate thru the layout.

While the 680GTX provides a smoother flow with the same large layouts.

Its an older card, so for certain stuff like CUDA newer cards will definitely smoke it.

Nvidia Qudroo 4000 Plus In My

However one big pro of the card that I count as a plus in my rig is that its only a single slot compared to basically every card thats usually a 2-slotter.

If youre going to swap out your current 3870 and keep the 5770, Id go for the 4000 if you get a good price (mine was free, since Im using a sample Nvidia sent us to work and never wanted back ) But if you want to swap both cards a GTX seems a solid and substantial replacement.

Nvidia Qudroo 4000 For Mac Install